iPhone 17
120Hz. A lighter everyday iPhone.

120Hz. A lighter everyday iPhone.

Two great phones.
Different things to love.
165Hz in supported games. Native 3.5x zoom.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
There isn’t enough shared evidence for a weighted recommendation. Explore the verified differences below.
Scores compare published capabilities, not lab-tested quality. Camera image quality and independent performance tests are not rated. See scoring
Display, Camera, Battery scoring is unavailable for this pair. Known hardware specs still appear below. We do not fill missing inputs with estimates.
Published device weight, without a case.
Schematic balance · not a physical simulation
Bigger is a preference, not a quality score.
Relative diagonals · illustrative shape, not actual size
Dedicated telephoto reach. No digital or crop zoom.
Lens illustration · not an image-quality test
Up-to claims. Different test methods; no endurance winner.
Shared 40-hour scale · not mixed-use battery life
Different strengths. Your call.
177 g vs 215 g, before a case. Also 5.2 mm narrower.
Preference, not included in the match score.3.5× native telephoto; the other phone has no separate telephoto module. Reach is not an image-quality verdict.
Verified hardware; Camera is not scored for this pair.6.78″ vs 6.3″ diagonally. Larger is a preference, not an automatic win.
Preference, not included in the match score.Published facts, not hands-on recommendations. These preferences do not add extra points to the match score; no tested battery gains are inferred.
Explore the numbers behind the match.
iPhone 17: Uses Apple's 3,000-nit outdoor peak, published 460 ppi and maximum adaptive 120Hz. This is a capability model, not a display-quality lab test.
OnePlus 15: The UK specification publishes 1,800 nits in high-brightness mode, while launch wording calls it peak brightness. These measurement labels are not interchangeable, so v1 peak-brightness scoring is withheld. Verified pixel density and refresh limits remain visible.
Explore the sourcesMake the comparison fit your life.
A great phone. An even better deal. Find the point where the value flips.
Comparable, positive scores are needed in your selected categories before we can calculate a price threshold.
Review your prioritiesForget the brand for a moment. Which set of specs feels more like you?
Manufacturer specifications. Your choice doesn’t change the comparison above.
Your selected categories: none. Scores reflect published capabilities, not hands-on testing. Manufacturer battery claims can use different test conditions. Verified specifications remain visible even where a category cannot be scored.
How we calculate scores256 GB · checked 4 Sept 2026
Comparable evidence is missing in one or more selected categories.
Uses Apple's 3,000-nit outdoor peak, published 460 ppi and maximum adaptive 120Hz. This is a capability model, not a display-quality lab test.
Selected weight: 1.
medium confidence · 100% model coverage100.00 × 40% = 40.00Manufacturer-published peak figure; not an independent measurement.
Apple UKCategory score = 40.00 + 28.00 + 25.00 = 93.00
Published camera facts are shown, but this catalogue has not completed verification of every pro-workflow input required by the v1 camera model. No camera-quality score is inferred from megapixels.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Complete verification of the four model-defined pro workflows.
Uses Apple's up-to 30-hour local-video claim and up-to-50%-in-20-minutes charging claim. Cross-brand confidence is low because test methods differ.
Selected weight: 1.
low confidence · 100% model coverage85.71 × 65% = 55.71Manufacturer up-to local-video claim, not independently measured mixed-use endurance. Apple's playback method differs from Samsung's.
Apple UKApple100.00 × 35% = 35.0050% divided by 20 minutes using Apple's 40W-or-higher adapter claim; not a sustained charging measurement.
Apple UKCategory score = 55.71 + 35.00 = 90.71
No comparable independent cross-platform benchmark is included in this official-spec catalogue.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Comparable CPU, GPU and sustained-performance measurements.
Apple's checked UK material does not state a model-specific fixed number of software-support years.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Published model-specific software-support duration.
Nominal diagonal; 6.27 inches as a standard rectangle, with a smaller actual viewable area.
Apple UKApple's outdoor peak claim; not an independent measurement.
Apple UKManufacturer up-to local-video claim, not independently measured mixed-use endurance. Apple's playback method differs from Samsung's.
Apple UKApple50% divided by 20 minutes using Apple's 40W-or-higher adapter claim; not a sustained charging measurement.
50 percent divided by 20 minutes.
Apple UKApple's connector list specifies USB-C, with no 3.5mm jack.
Apple UKFixed storage options and no removable storage interface in Apple's specification.
Apple UKUK specification: nano-SIM plus eSIM; dual eSIM also supported.
Apple UKApple's controlled-lab claim: up to 6m for 30 minutes. Resistance is not permanent.
Apple UKNo separate native telephoto module; the advertised 2x mode crops the main sensor.
Apple UKApple's optical-quality 2x mode uses the main sensor, not a separate lens.
Apple UK256 GB · checked 4 Sept 2026
Comparable evidence is missing in one or more selected categories.
The UK specification publishes 1,800 nits in high-brightness mode, while launch wording calls it peak brightness. These measurement labels are not interchangeable, so v1 peak-brightness scoring is withheld. Verified pixel density and refresh limits remain visible.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Unambiguous peak-brightness measurement definition.
Verified camera hardware is shown separately. The complete v1 pro-workflow audit is not available, so no camera-quality or capability score is inferred.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Complete model-specific verification of the four pro-workflow inputs.
The 31-hour video claim does not establish the local-playback protocol required by v1. The published video duration and charging claims remain visible without an inferred battery score.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Verification that the 31-hour claim uses local-video playback.
No comparable independent cross-platform CPU, GPU and sustained-performance tests are included.
Selected weight: 1.
Missing: Comparable independently measured performance results.
Derived from the UK launch date and published security-update endpoint. This describes total security coverage, not a promise of six Android upgrades.
Selected weight: 1.
medium confidence · 100% model coverage85.71 × 100% = 85.7113 November 2025 to 13 November 2031.
OnePlus UKOnePlus UKCategory score = 85.71 = 85.71
Infinite Black finish; Sand Storm has a different published weight.
OnePlus UKInfinite Black finish; Sand Storm has a different thickness.
OnePlus UKOnePlus's controlled-condition video claim. The checked disclaimer does not establish local versus streamed playback.
OnePlus UKThe UK test starts at 1%, with the official 120W adapter, screen off and rapid mode enabled; not sustained charging power.
(100 − 1) percentage points divided by approximately 39 minutes.
OnePlus UKSix-year total security window from launch, not six OS versions or six years remaining.
OnePlus UKOnePlus UK50W AIRVOOC requires compatible charging hardware.
OnePlus UKThe listed audio connection is USB Type-C, with no 3.5mm socket.
OnePlus UKThe UK eco-design section explicitly lists removable memory cards as incompatible.
OnePlus UKUK specification lists a dual nano-SIM slot and eSIM support.
OnePlus UKPublished UK eco-design classification. The current schema does not represent the additional high-pressure ratings.
OnePlus UK165Hz is limited to supported games; ordinary adaptive operation is 1–120Hz.
OnePlus UKOptical-quality mode, not a native 7x telephoto lens.
OnePlus UKThe UK video specification lists 8K at 30fps.
OnePlus UKYour priorities. The real differences. All in one place.