Pixel 10 Pro XL
6.73″ · LTPO OLED · 120 Hz · Google Tensor G5 · Titan M2 security coprocessor
256 GB · 16 GB RAM · Obsidian · UK specification G45RY
match
6.73″ · LTPO OLED · 120 Hz · Google Tensor G5 · Titan M2 security coprocessor
256 GB · 16 GB RAM · Obsidian · UK specification G45RY
Two great phones.
Different things to love.
6.3″ · 120 Hz
256 GB · Burgundy · UK A3714 · nano-SIM + eSIM · MJRR4QN/ARelease: 18 Sept 2026
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
4.5 points ahead across your selected display priorities.
Published-spec match · for your selected priorities. Scores compare published capabilities, not lab-tested quality. Camera image quality and independent performance tests are not rated. See scoring
The leading product stays the same when each available priority moves one step. This checks the published-spec model, not lab-tested quality.
Camera, Battery scoring is unavailable for this pair. Known hardware specs still appear below; default scores use only shared, verified categories.
See each difference separately. Select a topic for its sources and conditions.
Bar length shows the stated amount. Use your priorities to decide which amount suits you.
Pixels per inch describe display density. This is not an overall display-quality or colour-accuracy score.
Published device weight, without a case.
Schematic balance · not a physical simulation
Bigger is a preference, not a quality score.
Relative diagonals · illustrative shape, not actual size
Dedicated telephoto reach. No digital or crop zoom.
Lens illustration · not an image-quality test
Up-to claims. Different test methods; no endurance winner.
Shared 40-hour scale · not mixed-use battery life
Different strengths. Your call.
5× vs 4× native telephoto. Lens reach, not digital zoom or an image-quality verdict.
Verified hardware; Camera is not scored for this pair.6.73″ vs 6.3″ diagonally. Larger is a preference, not an automatic win.
Preference, not included in the match score.211 g vs 232 g, before a case. Also 4.7 mm narrower.
Preference, not included in the match score.Published facts, not hands-on recommendations. These preferences do not add extra points to the match score; no tested battery gains are inferred.
Explore the numbers behind the match.
Pixel 10 Pro XL: Published brightness, pixel density and maximum refresh under the existing capability model. This is not a laboratory display rating.
iPhone 18 Pro: Published brightness, pixel density and maximum refresh under the existing capability model. This is not a laboratory display rating.
Explore the sourcesMake the comparison fit your life.
A great phone. An even better deal. Find the point where the value flips.
A score-per-price simulation, not an objective buying verdict. Starts from reference MSRP; no live retailer offers.
Forget the brand for a moment. Which set of specs feels more like you?
Manufacturer specifications. Your choice doesn’t change the comparison above.
Your selected categories: Display. Scores reflect published capabilities, not hands-on testing. Manufacturer battery claims can use different test conditions. Verified specifications remain visible even where a category cannot be scored.
How we calculate scores256 GB · checked 10 Sept 2026
(97.55 × 1) ÷ 1
Published brightness, pixel density and maximum refresh under the existing capability model. This is not a laboratory display rating.
Selected weight: 1.
medium confidence · 100% model coverage100.00 × 40% = 40.00Manufacturer-published peak figure; not an independent measurement.
Google93.00 × 35% = 32.55Published or explicitly calculated pixel density.
GoogleCategory score = 40.00 + 32.55 + 25.00 = 97.55
Camera hardware is listed, but all inputs for the camera-capability model have not been verified.
Not included in your current weighted score.
Missing: Complete model-defined camera workflow evidence.
Comparable battery claim inputs are missing.
Not included in your current weighted score.
Missing: Playback and charging conditions.
Comparable independent CPU, GPU and sustained-performance measurements are not available here.
Not included in your current weighted score.
Missing: Independent benchmarks.
The published update policy is listed separately; remaining support is not converted into a quality score.
Not included in your current weighted score.
Missing: Comparable remaining-support scoring methodology.
Converted from the published 171 mm diagonal using 25.4 mm per inch. Rounded corners reduce viewable area.
GoogleManufacturer peak claim; test conditions differ between brands.
Googlenot published
not published
OS, security and Pixel Drop updates from initial availability; not seven years remaining at purchase.
GooglePixelsnap wireless charging (Qi2 certified) up to 25 W
Googlenot published
not published
not published
Manufacturer rating under laboratory conditions; water resistance is not permanent.
Googlenot published
8K requires Video Boost processing, rather than native 8K capture.
Google256 GB · checked 9 Sept 2026
(93.00 × 1 + 82.00 × 0 + 98.14 × 0) ÷ 1
Published brightness, pixel density and maximum refresh under the existing capability model. This is not a laboratory display rating.
Selected weight: 1.
medium confidence · 100% model coverage100.00 × 40% = 40.00Manufacturer-published peak figure; not an independent measurement.
Apple80.00 × 35% = 28.00Published or explicitly calculated pixel density.
AppleCategory score = 40.00 + 28.00 + 25.00 = 93.00
The existing camera-capability model uses lens reach, modules and published recording workflows. It does not measure photo quality.
Not included in your current weighted score.
medium confidence · 100% model coverage80.00 × 25% = 20.00Manufacturer crop-mode claim; not a separate lens.
Apple80.00 × 15% = 12.00Manufacturer crop-mode claim; not a separate lens.
Apple100.00 × 35% = 35.00The existing capability model counts RAW stills, professional codecs, log capture and external production tools. Apple lists ProRAW, ProRes, Apple Log 2 and Genlock.
AppleCategory score = 20.00 + 12.00 + 35.00 + 0.00 + 15.00 = 82.00
Uses the listed playback mode and short charging claim. Manufacturer protocols differ; this is not measured endurance.
Not included in your current weighted score.
low confidence · 100% model coverage97.14 × 65% = 63.14Apple UK local-video claim; not a mixed-use endurance test.
Apple100.00 × 35% = 35.00Apple claim with a separately sold 60W-capable adapter supporting AVS. 50 divided by 15 minutes; not a sustained charging rate.
AppleCategory score = 63.14 + 35.00 = 98.14
Comparable independent CPU, GPU and sustained-performance measurements are not available here.
Not included in your current weighted score.
Missing: Independent benchmarks.
The published update policy is listed separately; remaining support is not converted into a quality score.
Not included in your current weighted score.
Missing: Comparable remaining-support scoring methodology.
Nominal diagonal; actual viewable area is smaller.
AppleManufacturer claim, not an independent measurement.
AppleApple UK local-video claim; not a mixed-use endurance test.
AppleApple claim with a separately sold 60W-capable adapter supporting AVS. 50 divided by 15 minutes; not a sustained charging rate.
Applenot published
not published
not published
not published
Apple controlled test: 6 metres for 30 minutes; resistance is not permanent.
AppleAdaptive ProMotion; refresh depends on content.
AppleManufacturer crop-mode claim; not a separate lens.
AppleApple lists recording up to 4K at 120 fps; 8K is not included in the complete published recording specifications.
AppleYour priorities. The real differences. All in one place.